• Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.
  • Login
    Login Login form

The Problem with App Smashing

Posted by on in Education Technology
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 6084


According to EdTechTeacher, “App Smashing is the process of using multiple apps to create projects or complete tasks.”


According to Wikipedia, inquiry-based learning “starts by posing questions, problems or scenarios – rather than simply presenting established facts or portraying a smooth path to knowledge.”


The Problem


On many occasions, I have seen/read about App Smashing being leveraged in a way that is entirely anti-inquiry. In instances such as these, an overly contrived and smooth, risk free process is followed, all for the sake of a “cool” product.


Here are directions I pulled from a real project:


Using iMovie, shoot a scene of two actors portraying characters from a novel. Use the speed editor in iMovie to speed the video up slightly. Save the video to your Camera Roll. Open 8mm, pull the previous video from the Camera Roll, and use the “1920s filter” on the video and resave to the Camera Roll. Open Tellagami and use a solid green image as your background. Have the avatar in Tellagami explain what is going on in the silent movie scene. Finally, use DoInk Green Screen to combine the video created with iMovie & 8mm with the Tellagami commentary. Save the finished product to the Camera Roll.


As said by Chris Lehmann (@chrislehmann), “If you assign a project and get back 30 of the exact same thing, that’s not a project, that’s a recipe.”


The Solution


For short-term activities, I have never had an issue with “recipes,” as along as a bit of student freedom is included. But, when it comes to longer projects (or project-based learning experiences), inquiry-based learning and the process (not the product) must be prioritized. After all, if a large amount of class time is dedicated to a project, why would I want all of them to turn out (1) the same, and/or (2) exactly as I had planned? Doesn’t this defeat the purpose of student-centered learning?


So, how do we avoid this predicament?


When planning, do so with the end in mind. But make sure “the end” refers to enduring understandings. Not a product. Not an app. And not an overly contrived workflow.


Here are some ideas as to how we can plan with the appropriate end in mind, while also promoting student problem solving and creativity through the use of iPads:


  • Have students use a rubric, which ideally should be created by them. This way, they are free to demonstrate their understandings however they choose as long as they follow the rubric, which should align to standards (not a product). Ideally, students should view each rubric as a starting point and not a “ceiling” for what can be accomplished.

  • Provide students with the freedom to download their own apps to assist in fulfilling project requirements (if possible, given your “technology situation”). Student “app awareness” is one of the primary benefits of them using the same devices, such as iPads, both in and out of school.

  • Challenge your students to use a minimum amount of apps (in a worthwhile manner) when creating their final product. Although this approach shifts the focus on to the technology, students would be forced to stretch themselves by having to improve upon their work. Also, they might discover new tools they can use at later points in time.


In the End


In the end, there is obviously nothing wrong with App Smashing. But what matters most is that opportunities for student problem solving and creativity are prioritized.


While “app crazy” teachers may find the need to continuously “push themselves” by developing new App Smashing techniques…most students simply just don’t care.


Per Michael Fullan, “Pedagogy is the driver, technology is the accelerator.” Or, as can be the case with App Smashing, technology is the roadblock.

Connect with Ross on his blog and on Twitter.

Full disclosure: I have not received compensation of any kind for mentioning the products or services mentioned in this post. I was not solicited to write this post and I have no relationship with any of the companies mentioned.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

I am the coauthor of Hacking Project Based Learning, and the Supervisor of Instructional Practice K-12 in the Salisbury Township School District (1:1 MacBook/iPad) in Allentown, Pennsylvania. I am an Apple Distinguished Educator and a Google Certified Innovator. My passions are inquiry-based learning and quality professional development. I blog about these topics at rosscoops31.com. I regularly speak, present, and conduct workshops related to my writings and professional experiences.

When I am not working, I enjoy eating steak and pizza, exercising, reading books, playing on my computer, and provoking my three beautiful nephews. Please feel free to connect via email, RossCoops31@gmail.com, and Twitter, @RossCoops31.

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Saturday, 16 February 2019