In the past couple of weeks, the dorkiest subsegments of the twitterverse, the blogosphere, and various other social interwebs have erupted with news of singular they. In December the Washington Post made their own headlines by adding singular they to their style guide. Then last week, the folks at the American Dialect Society went a step further, naming singular they their word of the year. The selection was reported by the Washington Post, The New York Times, TIME, NPR, Slate, The Economist, and of course the Kilgore News Herald.
If you’re saying to yourself, Wait, I coulda sworn the word of the year was , you're not totally crazy. It seems that a number of organizations have recognized that word of the year announcements have the potential to go viral, resulting in a profusion of words of the year. But it's the ADS WOTY that goes back furthest and carries the most clout, and their selection was singular they.
The SNOOTs Protest!
Now it might not surprise you that certain subsubsegments or the dorkiest subsegments of the Internet are none too happy with this decision; singular they has peeved language SNOOTs for pretty much ever in sentences like, I don’t know who is responsible, but they will face the consequences.Prescriptively, if you needed a generic third person singular pronoun, he was your andro-normative go-to, as in When each guest arrives, he should sign in. Everyone’s favorite prescriptivists, Strunk and White, put it thusly: “The use of he as pronoun for nouns embracing both genders is a simple, practical convention rooted in the beginnings of the English language.” Other common options were he or she and s/he but these have a certain clunkiness that kept them from catching on. Those among us who wanted to put in a good faith effort would try to mix in a generic she from time to time.
If you only read the headlines and the comments on your social feed (or even if you read the entirety of the Kilgore News Herald’s article), you might walk away with the impression that the ADS announcement has simply validated and celebrated this usage which many believe to be lazy or at least nonstandard. But that’s why you should read beyond the headlines and comments and the Kilgore News Herald.
In fact, it is a distinct but related use of singular they that was selected by the ADS. The usage discussed above is for when you want to avoid he and she because you’re not referring to a specific person, and so you don’t want to use gendered language. But the ADS voters actually singled out “its newer usage as an identifier for someone who may identify as ’non-binary’ in gender terms.” That is, some people prefer neither he nor she and they is a common alternative. This makes the selection quite a propos in what has been a banner year for the trans rights movement.
Singular They in Your Syllabus
So, of course, I can’t tell you whether or where singular they will make its way into your classroom, but I do have some questions to pose to you:
Where does singular they fit in an ESL scope and sequence? Should it be taught alongside other subject pronouns from the start? Or is it too confusing and distracting to beginning learners? If we teach singular they, does that necessarily mean that we teach other inclusive language? Singular them? The nonbinary honorific, Mx.? Themself?
Teaching inclusive language is almost certain to engender (get it?) controversy or debate among some students. Do you have a plan in place to address these objections in a culturally sensitive manner?
A teacher should make an effort to separate their personal beliefs and preferences, linguistic or otherwise, from their language syllabus, shouldn’t they?